Families left out

No role for families

Families can have vital information about a person’s state of mind and whether they are at risk of coercion by others. The Bill wouldn’t require any of the professionals to speak to them.

Family members shouldn’t have a veto over a person’s autonomy. However, this Bill would leave many people finding out that their loved one has chosen an assisted death only after it has happened — when it is too late to raise concerns.

This will not only cause great distress to families; it will also prevent them from contributing to the assessment and panel processes. This is despite the fact they may have crucial evidence about the person’s mental state, or that they are being coerced by someone else.

There is also no route for anyone, even family members or others with concerns, to appeal the decision of the panel to grant an application. Only a “no” decision can be appealed; there is no recourse for anyone who has evidence showing why a “yes” decision is wrong.

“Family members and those who have provided care for the person are likely to be privy to information that has a significant bearing on the panel’s deliberations and decision. Perhaps a son or daughter knows that someone new has recently entered the life of their vulnerable parent, has slowly taken control of their finances and has encouraged them to cut contact with others.”

— Baroness Luciana Berger

Speaking or voting on this Bill?

We can provide the underlying evidence, a fuller briefing note, or a colleague willing to speak on the record — for MPs, peers and their staff, and for journalists on deadline.